tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post1217543923153747157..comments2024-03-29T09:36:02.064+00:00Comments on NIPC Law: Employees' Compensation: Kelly and Another v GE Healthcare Ltd [2009] EWHC 181 (Pat) (11 February 2009)Jane Lamberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14448574554083999342noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-59834914529953019622020-01-07T15:29:57.364+00:002020-01-07T15:29:57.364+00:00I say its beacause the benefit derived from the pa...I say its beacause the benefit derived from the patent itself was so great and easy to prove with records of profit over the years.. the benefir was great enought to establish the requirement of oustsnding benefit to the corporationAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-36196238421625889472011-01-23T09:42:56.865+00:002011-01-23T09:42:56.865+00:00very interesting,i would like to know why this cas...very interesting,i would like to know why this case succeeded where others failed??Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11810447696039507018noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-23535520487946582992009-08-14T13:56:39.265+01:002009-08-14T13:56:39.265+01:00Compensation of employees for certain inventions p...Compensation of employees for certain inventions pursuant to s 40 of the Patents Act 1977 was not restricted to remedying some loss. Compensation for an invention of ‘outstanding benefit’ was to be determined in accordance with all available evidence, as per s 41 of the 1977 Act, so as to secure a just and fair reward to the employee, neither limiting the employee to compensation for loss or Rebecahttp://www.asiarooms.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-19722201220434984482009-02-18T13:04:00.000+00:002009-02-18T13:04:00.000+00:00There have been earlier cases but this is the firs...There have been earlier cases but this is the first one that has succeeded. You will find a good summary of the law in the IP Office's Manual of Patent Practice at http://www.ipo.gov.uk/practice-sec-040.pdfJane Lamberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14448574554083999342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-51596488448784832902009-02-18T12:11:00.000+00:002009-02-18T12:11:00.000+00:00Interesting. Are there older decisions ruling on "...Interesting. Are there older decisions ruling on "outstanding" benefit?Emil A. Georgievhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18248803497072051911noreply@blogger.com