tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post4442068001766724362..comments2024-02-27T10:36:25.377+00:00Comments on NIPC Law: Practice: Media CAT v Adams and Others - The EndJane Lamberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14448574554083999342noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-31598122363853475152011-09-27T00:20:33.891+01:002011-09-27T00:20:33.891+01:00It has subsequently been reported that Crossley...It has subsequently been reported that Crossley's insurers did a deal on the costs issue with the defendants. <br /><br />But whilst that is the end of it as far as ACS-Law is involved, another player (who, prima facie, is making similar claims) has emerged, as can be seen at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWPCC/2011/27.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-79106553293705243012011-06-13T12:59:26.467+01:002011-06-13T12:59:26.467+01:00In addition to the wated costs, Crossley was also ...In addition to the wated costs, Crossley was also joined as claimant for costs purposes. So the costs are not confined just to those wasted items.<br /><br />In any event, Crossley was made bankrupt on 20th May 2010, (See: http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/eiir/IIRCaseIndivDetail.asp?CaseId=700104081&IndivNo=700226199&Court=HIGH&OfficeID=600000011&CaseType=B)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-70392626424632829862011-05-05T00:25:31.240+01:002011-05-05T00:25:31.240+01:00In fact, this was not the "final episode"...In fact, this was not the "final episode" and HHJ Birss QC did not decide that anything "merited" a wasted costs order. He decided that the application for a wasted costs order should proceed (that is, that ACS/Mr Crossley should show cause), but only in relation to the notices of discontinuance and the revenue-sharing agreement.<br /><br />The judge may (unwittingly) have Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com