tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post7046891929990099048..comments2024-03-27T12:53:27.221+00:00Comments on NIPC Law: Copyright in Photographs: Temple Island Collections and Creation RecordsJane Lamberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14448574554083999342noreply@blogger.comBlogger19125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-41056558723598108302013-02-13T17:48:28.308+00:002013-02-13T17:48:28.308+00:00I would like to thank you for the efforts you have...I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this post. I am hoping the same best work from you in the future as well. In fact your creative writing abilities has inspired me to start my own blog now. <a href="http://www.gomezlawfirm.com" rel="nofollow">Houston personal injury</a><br /><br /> Houston personal injury http://www.gomezlawfirm.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-60486793785690117422013-01-25T13:58:51.063+00:002013-01-25T13:58:51.063+00:00I arrived at this page via http://news.techeye.net...I arrived at this page via http://news.techeye.net/software/uk-copyright-law-wades-in-on-photoshopping which stated;<br /><br />"Jane Lambert, a barrister specialising in intellectual property law, wrote in her bog (sic) that she feels uneasy at Judge Birss's decision as it comes close to protecting copyright in an idea as opposed to expression."<br /><br />My mental image of this Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17830847898464454804noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-80076088492088684352012-05-02T14:42:52.957+01:002012-05-02T14:42:52.957+01:00New English Teas have now been given the right to ...New English Teas have now been given the right to appeal see www.newenglishteas.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-5626999902788723182012-05-01T21:56:00.324+01:002012-05-01T21:56:00.324+01:00Reminds me a little of the American photography ca...Reminds me a little of the American photography case of Gross v Seligman - 212 F. 930 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit March 10, 1914.<br /><br />I also think it is a bad decision;the buses are not in exactly the same 'pose', the use of red is not 'original' etc. The reasoning in Creation Records seems to me to be the correct interpretation of the law; i.e. that A Hallhttp://www.entertainmentadvice.co.uknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-85943439730119524162012-03-22T10:30:10.199+00:002012-03-22T10:30:10.199+00:00This verdict was picked up on the Swedish Pirate P...This verdict was picked up on the Swedish Pirate Party website falkvinge.net and someone commented that this ruling will result in only one officially sanctioned blues song.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07154837942085118058noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-67046739103420572242012-02-13T21:06:33.878+00:002012-02-13T21:06:33.878+00:00Very good decision. The copy of artistic concept i...Very good decision. The copy of artistic concept is evident here. This can be called pure plagiarism. This is the same like painting Mona Lisa for sale as a real picture, which we already know was painted by Da Vinci.photographerhttp://www.rygielski.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-14085726212147716852012-02-05T07:01:14.645+00:002012-02-05T07:01:14.645+00:00McWilliaims I feel that your statement "His e...McWilliaims I feel that your statement "His expression of the scene is his idea, no one else's and cannot be copied" is wrong. In the judgment it says "[the plaintive] had the idea of making the red bus stand against a black and white background from the film Schindler's List. That film includes striking use of the technique in a different context." So the expressionAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-83790701146180397792012-02-02T16:07:38.528+00:002012-02-02T16:07:38.528+00:00I may have missed some argument, but I feel the ju...I may have missed some argument, but I feel the judges decision was correct. The original image and all it's attributes, including technique, belong to the original photographer. His expression of the scene is his idea, no one else's and cannot be copied. As you mentioned, the photo-editing technics do play a part. Had the bus in the copied image been blue, we would not be blogging about mcwilliamsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-7873513093788862432012-02-01T22:29:01.907+00:002012-02-01T22:29:01.907+00:00I've set down my thoughts at
http://lawclange...I've set down my thoughts at<br /><br />http://lawclanger.blogspot.com/2012/02/photographer-of-westminster-omnibus.html<br /><br />- in short, the distinction from Creation Records is that the second image was created later than and as a copy of the first, rather than at the same time. (Most of the argument in CR was in an attempt to get around this point.)Simon Bradshawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14233721281522686341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-48136878835661666682012-01-31T11:58:08.451+00:002012-01-31T11:58:08.451+00:00An enjoyable article.
This judgment may not sit c...An enjoyable article.<br /><br />This judgment may not sit comfortably with some nor with Creation Records, however, I am not sure it is incorrect. Perhaps Creation Records is a poor precedent. <br /><br />Fundamentally, copyright should protect the expression of an idea and reward the creative skill, judgment and effort of the author; slavish copying ought to be discouraged. New English Teas Robert Cumminghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03246262303203506715noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-63120872163103899042012-01-30T02:56:54.696+00:002012-01-30T02:56:54.696+00:00The primary contention in Creation Records was tha...The primary contention in Creation Records was that the scene which was photographed was a creative expression. Look again at the first line of paragraph 7 that you omit from your quote: "It is said, first, that the scene itself (the arrangement or composition of the members of the group, the various objects and the site) is a copyright work." <br /><br />The secondary contention was Holgshttp://www.veoelmundo.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-67378014004336054512012-01-30T02:56:29.118+00:002012-01-30T02:56:29.118+00:00The primary contention in Creation Records was tha...The primary contention in Creation Records was that the scene which was photographed was a creative expression. Look again at the first line of paragraph 7 that you omit from your quote: "It is said, first, that the scene itself (the arrangement or composition of the members of the group, the various objects and the site) is a copyright work." <br /><br />The secondary contention was Holgshttp://www.veoelmundo.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-59618612384001903682012-01-29T09:29:11.136+00:002012-01-29T09:29:11.136+00:00That was also the case with Creation Records. I th...That was also the case with Creation Records. I think the distinction between the two cases lies in the use of photo editing technology.Jane Lamberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14448574554083999342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-90462304626836820222012-01-29T06:48:49.982+00:002012-01-29T06:48:49.982+00:00I'm having a hard time understanding why you&#...I'm having a hard time understanding why you're comparing this case to Creation Records. If anything it is consistent with the obiter in that case in that the copyrighted work here is an image, not a "set". <br /><br />This case is all about re-creating an image, not the mere circumstance of there being the same elements in two images.Holgshttp://www.veoelmundo.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-57834776969108001882012-01-28T09:45:46.878+00:002012-01-28T09:45:46.878+00:00A very well written and thoughtful piece. I think ...A very well written and thoughtful piece. I think that some common sense should have been applied to this case (and others like it) as well.Petenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-58884948069854324572012-01-26T12:45:01.792+00:002012-01-26T12:45:01.792+00:00Thank you for taking the time to write this inform...Thank you for taking the time to write this informative and insightful piece.Boyd Annisonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-21755184118405962012-01-26T10:29:31.475+00:002012-01-26T10:29:31.475+00:00Great article. Unfortunately the Judge seems unaw...Great article. Unfortunately the Judge seems unaware or did not put enough weight into the fact that the techniques he assumed were "copied" are commonly used throughout the world by people using Photoshop and other software for image manipulation. Had the manipulation been 'unique' then there may have been a case but anyone in the industry knows that the removal of sky and useAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-30793638683594884672012-01-26T07:01:52.324+00:002012-01-26T07:01:52.324+00:00This is completely idiotic. what next ? family pic...This is completely idiotic. what next ? family pictures on mugs being banned because someone else has done a similar template ? utterly stupidashok painoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15652882.post-60540185137123194992012-01-25T19:39:13.702+00:002012-01-25T19:39:13.702+00:00we ar ruled by idiots.. that´s the truth....we ar ruled by idiots.. that´s the truth....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com