NIPC Law

John Speed's Map of Lancashire (1610) Author:  John Speed, Copyright:  Public Domain, Source: Wikimedia Commons   Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Enterprise Court  (Her Honour Judge Melissa Clarke)  Charles and Ivy Ltd and another v Chelsea Supplies Ltd [2026] EWHC 2556 (IPEC) (9 Oct 2026) This was an inquiry as to damages for copyright infringement conducted by Her Honour Judge Melissa Clarke. The claimants were Charles and Ivy Top Ltd. ("CIT") and its wholly owned subsidiary, Charles and Ivy Ltd. ("CI").  The copyright works were 20 images of fencing elements and finishes, copies of which occupy the left-hand column of Annex A to the transcript of Judge Melissa Clarke's judgment in  Charles and Ivy Ltd and another v Chelsea Supplies Ltd   [2026] EWHC 2556 (IPEC) (9 Oct 2026). Those images had been made by Greg Robinson, a British citizen living in the UK.  He assigned the copyrights subsisting in those works to CIT on 7 July 2025....

© Kameraprojekt Graz 2015 / Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 4.   Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (HH Judge Melissa Clarke) Tipping v Smith [2026] EWHC 1855 (22 July 2026) In  Damages for Trade Mark Infringement - Fendi Italia and others v Rolo Fashion Ltd and another   30 Aug 2026, I explained that claimants in intellectual property cases whose rights have been infringed have "the choice of   seeking damages (compensation for the loss or damage that they sustained as a result of the infringements) to be assessed in proceedings known as 'an inquiry as to damages' or the surrender of any profits that the defendants had obtained from the infringements assessed in proceedings known as an 'account of profits.'"   Although Judge Melissa Clarke, who heard  Tipping v Smith   [2026] EWHC 1855, called the proceedings a "quantum trial" they were also an inquiry as to damages.  Cause of Action An important difference between  Fendi It...

Cyrillic Script Monument in Antarctica Author Inoceramid Bivalves   Licence CC BY-SA 4.0   Wikimedia Comm ons Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Moylan, Coulson and Arnold)   Lish v The Northern Block Ltd and another [2026] EWCA Civ 497 (27 April 2026) This was an appeal by the claimant, Mariya Vasiliyevna Lish, against the order of David Stone on 22 Aug 2025 in which he struck out two of her claims as an abuse of process of the court for the reasons given in his judgment (see  Lish v The Northern Block Ltd and Another [2025] EWHC 2172 (Ch) 23 Aug 2025).   I discussed that judgment in  Copyright - Lish v The Northern Block Ltd.   on 30 Aug 2025. Background The   first   defendant, The Northern Block ("TNB"), was a type foundry which supplied typefaces or fonts in various alphabets to graphic designers, printers, manufacturers and others.  It was founded by the second defendant, Jonathan Hill. Mrs Lish was a typeface des...

The Rolls Building , L ocation of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court Author Muhammad Karns, Judicial Office X feed Licence CC BY-SA 4.0 Source Wikimedia Commons   Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (HH Judge Hacon)  Edozo Ltd v Valos (UK) Ltd [2026] EWHC 93 (IPEC) (21 Jan 2026) This was an application by the claimant to strike out parts of the defendant's defence and counterclaim. The claimant had brought proceedings for a declaration of non-infringement of copyright, while the defendant counterclaimed for relief from infringement.     The claimant's application came before His Honour Judge Hacon on 15 Jan 2026.  By para [61] of his judgment in  Edozo Ltd v Valos (UK) Ltd [2026] EWHC 93 (IPEC) (21 Jan 2026), His Honour acceded to the application. The Parties The claimant was Edozo Ltd ( "Edozo" ) and the defendant was Valos (UK) Ltd . (" Valos ").  The judge described Edozo and Valos as "competitors in a market which...

By Taner Yildirim ( The National Institute of Standards and Technology - NIST ) -  Public Domain ,  Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (HH Judge Melissa Clarke)  Boghossian v IOP Publishing Ltd .  [2025] EWHC 3317 (IPEC) (17 Dec 2025) This was an action for copyright infringement brought by  Ardemis Boghossian ("Prof Boghossian")  against  IOP Publishing Limited ("IOP"), the publishing arm of the Institute of Physics  and publisher of the journal Nanotechnology .  Prof Boghossian claimed joint ownership of the copyright in a paper which IOP published in Nanotechnology in the names of Dejan M Djokic ("Dr Djokic") and  Aranya Goswami ("Mr Goswami") on 23 Oct 2017.  IOP brought Part 20 proceedings against Dr. Djokic seeking an indemnity or contribution in case Prof Boghossian's claim succeeded. The Parties Prof Boghossian was a chemical engineer and research scientist. In 2015, she was an Assistant Profe...

  Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (HH Judge Hacon) Harrison (t/a Rayson Engineering) v Buchanan and anothe r [2025] EWHC 3283 (IPEC) (17 Dec 2025) This was a claim for breach of contract and copyright infringement.  The contract claim was based on the claimant's allegation that the defendants commissioned him to create drawings of components for an electrochemical water conditioner.  The copyright claim was based on the claimant's further allegation that copyright subsisted in those drawings, that he was the first owner of those copyrights and that the defendants had used the drawings without his licence.  The defendants denied that there was a binding agreement and argued that the drawings were not fit for purpose.  The action came on for trial before His Honour Judge Hacon on 21 Nov 2025.  By para [21] of his judgment in Harrison (t/a Rayson Engineering) v Buchanan and Another [2025] EWHC 3283 (IPEC), which he handed down on 17 ...

By Rbirkby at English Wikipedia - Photo taken by rbirkby on en:26 July en:2006 (Transferred from en. wikipedia to Commons by Holger.Ellgaard.), CC BY 2.5, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=3736830 Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Sir Colin Birss, Chancellor, Lord Justice Arnold and Lady Justice Falk)  AGA Rangemaster Group Ltd v UK Innovations Group Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1622 (15 Dec 2025) This was an appeal by UK Innovations Group Ltd. ("UKIG") against the judgment of Mr Nicholas Caddick KC in    AGA Rangemaster Group Ltd v UK Innovations Group Ltd and another [2024] EWHC 1727 (IPEC) on 8 July 2024 that UKIG had infringed trade marks held by  AGA R a ngemaster Group Ltd ("ARG") .  There was also a cross appeal by ARG against the dismissal of its claim for copyright infringement.  I discussed Mr Caddick's judgment in  Trade Marks and Copyright - AGA Rangemaster Group Ltd v UK Innovations Group Ltd . on 18 July 2024.  The appeal cam...