NIPC Law

By Rbirkby at English Wikipedia - Photo taken by rbirkby on en:26 July en:2006 (Transferred from en. wikipedia to Commons by Holger.Ellgaard.), CC BY 2.5, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=3736830 Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Sir Colin Birss, Chancellor, Lord Justice Arnold and Lady Justice Falk)  AGA Rangemaster Group Ltd v UK Innovations Group Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1622 (15 Dec 2025) This was an appeal by UK Innovations Group Ltd. ("UKIG") against the judgment of Mr Nicholas Caddick KC in    AGA Rangemaster Group Ltd v UK Innovations Group Ltd and another [2024] EWHC 1727 (IPEC) on 8 July 2024 that UKIG had infringed trade marks held by  AGA R a ngemaster Group Ltd ("ARG") .  There was also a cross appeal by ARG against the dismissal of its claim for copyright infringement.  I discussed Mr Caddick's judgment in  Trade Marks and Copyright - AGA Rangemaster Group Ltd v UK Innovations Group Ltd . on 18 July 2024.  The appeal cam...

Crying mask Melpomene and laughing mask Thalia Author Tim Green   Licence CC BY-SA 2.0   Source Wikimedia Commons   Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (Recorder Amanda Michaels) Rinkoff v Baby Cow Productions Ltd [2025] EWHC 39 (IPEC) (17 Jan 2025) This was a claim for copyright infringement. The work in which copyright was alleged to subsist as an original dramatic work was the format of two series of comedy shows called "Shambles ". The individual who devised that format was the writer and comedian Joshua Rinkoff ("Mr Rinkoff") who performs under the name  Harry Deansway.   Mr Rinkoff alleged that Baby Cow Productions Ltd . ("Baby Cow") had copied his format to make a series called "Live at the Moth Club".  The action came on for trial before Recorder Amanda Michaels on 4 and 5 Nov 2024.  By her judgment of 17 Jan 2025, the recorder dismissed Mr Rinkoff's claim (see Rinkoff v Baby Cow Productions Ltd [2025] EWHC 39 (IP...

  Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Enterprise Cour t (Mr Campbell Forsyth) WaterRower (UK) Ltd v Liking Ltd . [2024] EWHC 2806 (IPEC) At the case management conference in WaterRower (UK) Ltd v Liking Ltd (T/A Topiom) [2022] EWHC 2084 (IPEC) (5 Aug 2022), Liking Ltd ("Liking") applied unsuccessfully to strike out or obtain summary judgment in, a claim against it by WaterRower (UK) Ltd.  ("WaterRower") for infringement of copyright in several of its water resistance rowing machines ("the Works"). WaterRower had alleged that the Works were "works of artistic craftsmanship" within the meaning of s. 4 (1) (c) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 ("CDPA").  Mr David Stone, who heard the application, said: "I have found that the Claimant’s case that the WaterRower is a work of artistic craftsmanship is not 'bound to fail'. I have not reached a concluded view that the WaterRower is a work of artistic craftsmanship -...