Intellectual Property shouldn't be just for the Rich and Powerful Part II

Yesterday I spoke about the inequality of access to the legal tools that protect investment in brands, design, technology and the arts even in very advanced countries like my own and what I personally have tried to do about it over the last 20 years. This inequality is magnified internationally.

A number of organizations try to do something about that and a pretty good means of keeping up to date with them is the blog and website Intellectual Property Watch. At the moment everyone's attention is focussed on the WTO ministerial in Hong Kong. There have already been a couple of good posts on those proceedings, namely a mention of the 6 Dec 2005 agreement in respect of generic medicines and Chinese legislation to implement an earlier agreement ("TRIPS Public Health Amendment Questioned; China Implements Decision" and "Experts Debate IP Issues As Hong Kong WTO Ministerial Opens", both by Tove Gerhardsen).

There is, of course, much, much more on all sorts of topics on the interface between IPR and development ranging from the medicines agreement, the extension of art 66 TRIPs, protection of indigenous and traditional knowledge, food policy to name just a few. I shall be inserting a link through to this site as soon as I have time to work on the template of this blog.


ipdragon said…
Hi John,

Interesting blog. My blog, IP Dragon is focusing on IP in China too. I am a bit disappointed about the IP related news over the WTO summit. I guess the dispute between the US, Japan, Switzerland and China needs to be settled. That this is happening is of course news.

Don't hesitate to comment or forward articles about IP in China.

IP Dragon
John Lambert said…
Thanks for your visit, Dragon. Your comments are very well received. I have visited your blog and am very impressed. I have mentioned it to my readers and I hope that some of them will benefit from it as much as I hope to do.
Kind regards
JOhn Lambert

Popular posts from this blog

Were we to go - what would Brexit mean for IP?

The Draft Patents (European Patent with Unitary Effect and Unified Patent Court) Order 2016

Supreme Court upholds Court of Appeal in Trunki