Registered Trade Marks


















13 June 2017 Updated 14 Jan 2019 and 13 Jan 2021
Trade marks for the United Kingdom may be registered with the Intellectual Property Office ("IPO") under the provisions of the Trade Marks Act 1994. The Act implemented Directive (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks  ("the Trade Marks Directive") which applied to the UK until 23:00 on 31 Fev 2020.   The Act is supplemented by the Trade Marks Rules 2008.

What is a Trade Mark?

 A trade mark is defined by s.1 (1) of the Act as:

"any sign which is capable-
(a) of being represented in the register in a manner which enables the registrar and other competent authorities and the public to determine the clear and precise subject matter of the protection afforded to the proprietor, and
(b) of distinguishing goods or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings."

Specifically included in the definition are words (including personal names), designs, letters, numerals or the shape of goods or their packaging."

What can be registered?

With a number of exceptions, any sign that falls within the definition of a trade mark can be registered. The exceptions fall into two groups.  Those that are inherently objectionable such as marks that are devoid of distinctive character, offensive or are too similar to royal, national or other protected emblems. Those that are the same as, or similar to, marks that have already been registered or applied for which are used in relation to the same or similar goods or services.

Applications to register a Trade Mark

Applications to register marks may be made online or manually on prescribed forms in relation to specified goods or services. An application can also be made through the World Intellectual Property Organization pursuant to the Madrid Protocol.  It is advisable but not compulsory to instruct a trade mark attorney to file the application (see Jane Lambert  Can I apply for a Trade Mark by myself or must I instruct an Attorney? 31 May 2017 NIPC-Branding).

Examination

Each application to register a trade mark is examined by an official known as "an examiner," If the examiner objects to any aspect of the application, he or she will set out the objection in writing and give the applicant an opportunity to respond,  If the examiner considers that the objection cannot be overcome he or she may refuse the application.

Ex Parte Appeals

An applicant may appeal to the Registrar (or chief executive of the IPO) against any decision of the examiner. The Registrar appoints an official known as "a hearing officer" to hear and determine the appeal on his or her behalf.  I described the procedure in If the examiner says "no" - ex parte hearings in the Trade Marks Registry 10 Aug 2015 NIPC London.

Publication

If there is no objection by the examiner or if all objections are overcome, the IPO will publish the application in the Trade Marks Journal. Publication gives an opportunity to those who have already registered, or applied to register, the same or a similar mark in respect of the same or similar goods or services, to oppose the application. Those who could prevent the use of a mark by bringing a claim for passing off may also oppose the application.  Alternatively, those who object to an application can make representations to the Registrar without formally opposing it.

Opposition

 Unless the parties can come to terms, oppositions are determined by a hearing officer appointed by the Registrar. I discussed the procedure in Oppositions in the IPO's Trade Marks Registry 12 Aug 2015 NIPC London.

Registration

 If there is no opposition, or any opposition is disposed of, the application will be granted. The mark will be registered in the register of trade with effect from the date of filing. Notice of registration will be published. The applicant (henceforth known as "the registered proprietor") will receive a certificate of registration.  Upon registration, the registered proprietor acquires exclusive rights in the trade mark which are infringed by use of the trade mark in the United Kingdom without his or her consent.

Infringement

 A trade mark is infringed by using in the course of trade:
  • a sign which is identical with the registered trade mark in relation to goods or services which are identical with those for which it is registered; or
  • a sign where because:
    - the sign is identical with the registered trade mark and is used in relation to goods or services similar to those for which the trade mark is registered, or
    - the sign is similar to the trade mark and is used in relation to goods or services identical with or similar to those for which the trade mark is registered,
    there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public, which includes the likelihood of association with the registered trade mark; or
  • in relation to goods or services a sign which is identical with or similar to the registered trade mark, where the trade mark has a reputation in the United Kingdom and the use of the sign, being without due cause, takes unfair advantage of, or is detrimental to, the distinctive character or the repute of the trade mark.
Enforcement

A registered proprietor may sue an alleged infringer in the civil courts of England and Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland for an injunction to restrain further infringement and damages or an account of profits and other relief in respect of past infringement. In England and Wales, such proceedings may be brought in the Chancery Division of the High Court of England including the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court ("IPEC") or the County Court. Claims worth £10,000 or less may be brought in the IPEC Small Claims Track. Some trade mark infringements are criminal offences which may be prosecuted in the Crown Court or magistrates courts.

Invalidity

A court or the Registrar may declare a registration invalid on any of the grounds upon which an application to register a trade mark could have been opposed if it appears that the mark should never have been registered. An application for a declaration of invalidity may be raised by a defendant as a counterclaim in infringement proceedings or in an application to the Registrar.  Invalidity proceedings before the Registrar are determined by a hearing officer and are similar to opposition proceedings.

Revocation

The court or Registrar may revoke the registration of a trade mark if ts not used, ceases to be used, ceases to be distinctive or becomes deceptive.  An application for the revocation of a mark may be raised by way of counterclaim in infringement proceedings or in an application to the Registrar. Revocation proceedings before the Registrar are determined by a hearing officer.

Further Information

Further information on registered trade marks can be obtained from Jane Lambert on 020 7404 5252 during office hours.

Popular posts from this blog

Copyright in Photographs: Temple Island Collections and Creation Records

Image
In our very first NIPC newsletter which we published in June 1997 I wrote a case note on Mr. Justice Lloyd's decision in  Creation Records Ltd. and Others v News Group Newspapers Ltd   [1997] EMLR 444, [1997] EWHC Ch 370, (1997) 16 Tr LR 544. In that case Mr. Noel Gallagher of Oasis and others applied for an interlocutory injunction to restrain The Sun from offering for sale and selling a poster of Oasis that featured a photo of an elaborate set that included a white Rolls Royce in a country club swimming pool. The Sun's photograph was very similar to the photograph that appeared on an Oasis album cover. The similarity arose because The Sun's photographer shot the same scene at roughly the same time and from the same angle as Mr. Gallagher's photographer but he did not reproduce any part of Oasis's print or negative. The learned judge held that the plaintiffs had no arguable case for infringement of copyright though he accepted that they had an arguable case for br...
Read more

"What is meant by "Due Cause" in s.10 (3) of the Trade Marks Act? The Red Bull Case

Image
Amsterdam   Source Wikipedia According to Wikipedia  Red Bull is the most popular energy drink in the world, with 5.2 billion cans sold in 2012. Its manufacturer, Red Bull GmbH , has registered the RED BULL mark has registered those words and their accompanying logo as word and device marks in trade mark registries around the world including the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property ( "BOIP" ) . The company registered that sign with BOIP for non-alcoholic drinks in class 32 with effect from 11 July 1983. After decades of massive sales and extensive advertising nobody could argue that that mark has a reputation within the meaning of art 5 (2) of the Trade Marks Directive (Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 22 October 2008   to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks OJ 8.11.2008 p 299/25).  S.10 (3) of our Trade Marks Act 1994   implements that provision. There is in the Net...
Read more

Copyright: Creation Records Ltd. v News Group

It is trite law that if two photographers take identical pictures of the same scene at the same time from the same position each of their photographs is an original work and neither infringes the copyright in the other. However, much of the skill of a photographer lies in his choice of subject and the arrangement of the scene. The question whether copyright subsists independently in such an arrangement arose in Creation Records Ltd. v News Group Newspapers Ltd . (1997) The Times 27 April.   The Facts A swimming pool at a country club was drained and various props including a white Rolls Royce motor car assembled for a photograph of a well-known group of musicians for reproduction on their album cover. Although the public was not admitted to the session certain fans of the group who happened to be there were allowed to photograph the scene before official pictures were taken. A freelance photographer who was booked into the club photographed the scene during the session. One of his pict...
Read more