Posts

Showing posts with the label Lord Justice Arnold

Patents - Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd v ZTE Corporation

Image
Chongqing Municipal People's Auditorium Author Iswzo   Licence CC BY-SA 4.0   Source Wikimedia Commons Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Jackson, Arnold and Birss)  Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd and another v ZTE Corporation and other s [2025] EWCA Civ 1383 (31 Oct 2025) This was an appeal by ZTE Corporation and others ("ZTE") against the decision of Mr Justice Mellor in  Samsung Electronics Co Ltd and Another v ZTE Corporation and others [2025] EWHC 1432 (Pat) (25 June 2025) to grant Samsung Electronics Co Ltd and Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd ("Samsung"), the following interim declarations: "1. ZTE are in breach of their obligations of good faith under clause 6.1 of the ETSI IPR Policy. 2. A willing licensor in the position of ZTE, and in light of the undertaking given by Samsung, would enter into the interim cross-licence with Samsung on terms and including the sum to be paid by Samsung by way of royalty in respect of the interim licence period...

The Appeal - easyGroup Ltd v Easy Live (Services) Ltd.

Image
  Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Coulson, Arnold and Zacaroli) easyGroup Ltd v Easy Live (Services) Ltd and others [2025] EWCA Civ 946 (24 July 2025) This was an appeal by easyGroup Ltd ("easyGroup")  against the order of Mr Nicolas Caddick KC of 17 Sept 2024 dismissing that company's claims for trade mark infringement and a declaration of invalidity against Easy Live (Services) Ltd. ("ELS") for the reasons set out in his judgment in easyGroup Ltd v Easy Live (Services) Ltd and others [2024] EWHC 2282 (Ch) (4 Sept 2024).  There was also a cross-appeal against Mr Caddick's dismissal of ELS's counterclaim for revocation of one of the claimant's trade marks for non-use.  I discussed Mr Caddick's judgment in  Trade Marks - easyGroup Ltd v Easy Live (Services) Ltd .  on 10 Sept 2024.   The Variant Forms Issue One of Lord Justice Arnold's reasons for permitting both the appeal and cross-appeal was that Mr Caddick's conclusion o...

The Lidl v Tesco Appeal - Lord Justice Arnold on Copyright

Image
  Jane Lambert Court of Appeal  (Lord Justices Lewison, Arnold and Birss)  Lidl Great Britain Ltd and Another v Tesco Stores Ltd and Anothe r (Rev1) [2024] EWCA Civ 262 (19 March 2024) This is the third of my supplementary articles on Lord Justice  Arnold's judgment in Lidl Great Britain Ltd and Another v Tesco Stores Ltd and Anothe r (Rev1) [2024] EWCA Civ 262 (19 March 2024). I explained the reasons for these supplementary articles in the second paragraph of Lord Justice Arnold's Guidance on Trade Mark Law in the Lidl v Tesco Appeal on 25 March 2024. In this article, I discuss Lord Justice Arnold's guidance on copyright which he set out in paras [38] to [44] of his judgment. Lord Justice Arnold acknowledged at para [38] that little dispute before the judge as to the applicable principles of copyright law but he chose to comment on them anyway because Mrs Justice Joanna Smith "did not have the benefit of  t he subsequent decisions of the Court of Appeal] in ...

The Lidl v Tesco Appeal: Lord Justice Arnold on Passing off

Image
Author: Paul Hurst Licence CC   BY-SA 2.5 Deed   Source Wikimedia Commons Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Lord Justices Lewison, Arnold and Birss) Lidl Great Britain Ltd and Another v Tesco Stores Ltd and Anothe r (Rev1) [2024] EWCA Civ 262 (19 March 2024 ) This is the second of my supplementary articles on Lord Justice Jackson's judgment in   Lidl Great Britain Ltd and Another v Tesco Stores Ltd and Anothe r (Rev1) [2024] EWCA Civ 262 (19 March 2024). I explained the reasons for these supplementary articles in the second paragraph of  Lord Justice Arnold's Guidance on Trade Mark Law in the Lidl v Tesco Appeal   yesterday.  In this article, I shall discuss Lord Justice Arnold's guidance on passing off  which he set out in paras [27] to [35] of his judgment. The learned Lord Justice said in para [28] that the fundamental principle underlying the law of passing off may be simply stated in contemporary language as "no person may misrepresent their goo...

Lord Justice Arnold's Guidance on Trade Mark Law in the Lidl v Tesco Appeal

Image
Sir Richard Arnold Author Dakej2point3   Licence CC BY-SA 4.0  Deed   Source Wikimedia Commons   Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Lord Justices Lewison, Arnold and Birss) Lidl Great Britain Ltd and Another v Tesco Stores Ltd and Anothe r (Rev1) [2024] EWCA Civ 262 (19 March 2024) Yesterday I discussed the Court of Appeal's judgment in  Lidl Great Britain Ltd and Another v Tesco Stores Ltd and Anothe r  (Rev1) [2024] EWCA Civ 262 (19 March 2024) in Trade Marks - The Appeal in Lidl v Tesco .  I explained that Lord Justice Arnold had delivered the lead judgment which consisted of 196 paragraphs.  He set out the grounds of the appeal by Tesco Stores Ltd and Tesco Plc ("Tesco") against Mrs Justice Joanna Smith's findings on trade mark infringement and passing off at para [122] and its grounds of appeal against her findings on copyright infringement at para [188]. Paras [123] to [161] addressed the appeal against the judge's findings on passing off, para...